Establishing priorities to strengthen National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the Americas faced a significant decline in vaccination coverage as well as increased vaccine hesitancy. The objective of this paper is to summarize the challenges and opportunities outlined by the National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and prioritize targeted interventions. The exploratory survey included open-ended questions on two primary components: challenges, and opportunities. Free-text comments presented by each NITAG were collated and classified using indicators and sub-indicators of the NITAG Maturity Assessment Tool (NMAT). Opportunities were classified thematically, and priority actions were generated from the responses. All 21 NITAGs in LAC, representing 40 countries, 76 % of which have been active for over a decade, responded to the survey. The most common challenges were establishment and composition (62 %), integration into policymaking (62 %), resources and secretariat (52 %), and stakeholder recognition (48 %). The distribution of responses was seen across the whole sample and did not suggest a more pronounced need in relation to year of establishment. Opportunities included maximizing the Regional NITAG Network of the Americas (RNA) to facilitate collaboration, information sharing, visibility, and communication; existing global, regional, and systemic analyses; the World Health Organization/Pan American Health Organization (WHO/PAHO) templates for standard operating procedures; twinning programs with mature NITAGs; and NITAGs in governance structures. Action plans were outlined to formalize the establishment of NITAGs and broaden their composition; strengthen decision-making and access to data resources; and enhance the credibility of evidence-based recommendations and their uptake by policymakers and the public. NITAG challenges are not unique to LAC. NITAGs have outlined a short-term prioritized action plan which is critical to enhancing NITAG value and importance in countries.

Factors associated with discussing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among Jamaican medical providers.

BACKGROUND: The Ministry of Health and Wellness of Jamaica has endorsed the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as an HIV prevention strategy; however, PrEP was not included in the national HIV prevention program in 2021. METHODS: A cross-sectional online study involving physicians in Jamaica was conducted in 2021 to describe PrEP awareness, beliefs, attitudes, and practices. The study also assessed individual and social factors associated with discussing PrEP with patients and willingness to prescribe PrEP. FINDINGS: The mean age and standard deviation (SD) of the 69 physicians who completed the survey were 45.5 ± 13.6 years. Most of the participants (80%) reported that they were somewhat familiar with PrEP. PrEP attitude and perceived comfort in prescribing PrEP were moderate among participating physicians, with a mean and SD of 3.9 ± 0.8 and 3.6 ± 0.9 respectively. Six percent of physicians reported that they had prescribed PrEP and 17% had discussed PrEP with their patients in the past year. However, most (90%) reported that they were willing to prescribe PrEP after being informed about it. In the unadjusted model, identifying as Christian (compared to non-Christian) and reporting stronger homophobic beliefs were associated with reduced odds of discussing PrEP with patients. In the multivariable model, only homophobia remained statistically significant (OR, 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.63). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that physicians in Jamacia may be willing to prescribe PrEP; however, homophobia is a barrier to discussions, underscoring the need for the Ministry of Health and Wellness to recognize the role that homophobia plays in the national HIV program to further reduce HIV incidence in Jamaica.

Trends and factors associated with initiation of HIV treatment among PLHIV in Jamaica, 2015-2019.

INTRODUCTION: Jamaica did not achieve the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets in 2020. This study aimed to examine trends and factors associated with uptake of HIV treatment among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Jamaica and to assess the effectiveness of revised treatment guidelines. METHODS: This secondary analysis used patient-level data from the National Treatment Service Information System. The baseline sample was 8147 PLHIV initiating anti-retroviral treatment (ART) between January 2015-December 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical variables and the primary outcome timing of ART initiation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with ART initiation (same day vs 31+ days), using categorical variables for age group, sex and regional health authority. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are reported. RESULTS: Most persons initiated ART at 31+ days (n = 3666, 45%) after the first clinic date or on the same day (n = 3461, 43%). Same day ART initiation increased from 37% to 51% over 5 years and was significantly associated with males (aOR = 0.82, CI = 0.74-0.92), 2018 (aOR = 0.66, CI = 0.56-0.77), 2019 (aOR = 0.77, CI = 0.65-0.92). late HIV diagnosis (aOR = 0.3, CI = 0.27-0.33) and viral suppression at the first viral load test (aOR = 0.6, CI = 0.53-0.67). ART initiation at 31+days was associated with 2015 (aOR = 1.21, CI = 1.01-1.45) and 2016 (aOR = 1.30, CI = 1.10-1.53) compared to 2017. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that same day ART initiation increased between 2015-2019, however it remains too low. Same day initiation was associated with the years after Treat All implementation and late initiation before Treat All, providing evidence of the strategy's success. In order to achieve the UNAIDS targets, there is a need to also increase the number of diagnosed PLHIV retained on treatment in Jamaica. Further studies should be conducted to understand important challenges to accessing treatment as well as differentiated care models to improve treatment uptake and retention.

A review of immunization legislation for children in English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean countries.

Objective: To assess the legislative frameworks concerning childhood vaccination in the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean and propose a model legislative framework for Caribbean countries. Methods: This study included a survey of 22 countries and territories in the Caribbean regarding legal vaccination mandates for school entry, budget allocations, sanctions, or exemptions. A legal consultant conducted a comprehensive search and analysis of legislation regarding vaccination among 13 Caribbean countries/territories. A comparative analysis of the legislation under five themes-legislative structure, mandatory vaccination, national immunization schedule, sanctions, and exemptions-formed the basis for the proposed model legislation. Results: Among the 22 Caribbean countries/territories, 17 (77%) had legislation mandating vaccination, 16 (94%) mandated vaccination for school entry, 8 (47%) had a dedicated budget for immunization programs, and 13 (76%) had no legislated national schedules. The source of legislation includes six (35%) using the Education Act, eight (47%) the Public Health Act, and five (29%) a free-standing Vaccination Act. Three countries/territories-Jamaica, Montserrat, and Saint Lucia-had immunization regulations. In 12 (71%) of the 17 countries with legislation, sanctions were included, and 10 (59%) permitted exemptions for medical or religious/philosophical beliefs. Conclusions: Several countries in the Caribbean have made failure to vaccinate a child an offense. By summarizing the existing legislative frameworks and approaches to immunization in the Caribbean, the analysis guides policymakers in making effective changes to immunization legislation in their own countries.

A review of immunization legislation for children in English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean countries

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To assess the legislative frameworks concerning childhood vaccination in the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean and propose a model legislative framework for Caribbean countries. Methods. This study included a survey of 22 countries and territories in the Caribbean regarding legal vaccination mandates for school entry, budget allocations, sanctions, or exemptions. A legal consultant conducted a comprehensive search and analysis of legislation regarding vaccination among 13 Caribbean countries/ territories. A comparative analysis of the legislation under five themes—legislative structure, mandatory vaccination, national immunization schedule, sanctions, and exemptions—formed the basis for the proposed model legislation. Results. Among the 22 Caribbean countries/territories, 17 (77%) had legislation mandating vaccination, 16 (94%) mandated vaccination for school entry, 8 (47%) had a dedicated budget for immunization programs, and 13 (76%) had no legislated national schedules. The source of legislation includes six (35%) using the Education Act, eight (47%) the Public Health Act, and five (29%) a free-standing Vaccination Act. Three countries/ territories—Jamaica, Montserrat, and Saint Lucia—had immunization regulations. In 12 (71%) of the 17 countries with legislation, sanctions were included, and 10 (59%) permitted exemptions for medical or religious/ philosophical beliefs. Conclusions. Several countries in the Caribbean have made failure to vaccinate a child an offense. By summarizing the existing legislative frameworks and approaches to immunization in the Caribbean, the analysis guides policymakers in making effective changes to immunization legislation in their own countries.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Evaluar los marcos legislativos relativos a la vacunación infantil en el Caribe de habla inglesa y neerlandesa y proponer un modelo de marco legislativo para los países del Caribe. Métodos. En este estudio se incluyó una encuesta en 22 países y territorios del Caribe sobre los requisitos legales de vacunación para el ingreso escolar, asignaciones presupuestarias, sanciones o exenciones. Un consultor jurídico realizó una búsqueda y un análisis exhaustivos de la legislación relativa a la vacunación en 13 países y territorios del Caribe. Un análisis comparativo de la legislación dividido en cinco temas (estructura legislativa, vacunación obligatoria, calendario nacional de vacunación, sanciones y exenciones) formó la base del modelo de legislación propuesto. Resultados. Entre los 22 países y territorios del Caribe, 17 (77%) contaban con leyes sobre vacunación obligatoria, 16 (94%) exigían la vacunación para el ingreso escolar, 8 (47%) tenían un presupuesto dedicado a los programas de vacunación y 13 (76%) no disponían de calendarios nacionales estipulados por ley. Entre las fuentes de la legislación, seis países y territorios (35%) empleaban la ley de educación, ocho (47%) la ley de salud pública y cinco (29%) una ley independiente de vacunación. Tres países y territorios —Jamaica, Montserrat y Santa Lucía— disponían de regulaciones sobre vacunación. Doce (71%) de los 17 países con legislación tenían sanciones y 10 (59%) permitían exenciones por creencias médicas o religiosas o filosóficas. Conclusiones. Varios países del Caribe han tipificado como delito el no vacunar a un niño o niña. Al resumir los enfoques y marcos legislativos existentes para la vacunación en el Caribe, este análisis ofrece orientaciones a los responsables de formular las políticas para que realicen modificaciones efectivas en la legislación relativa a la vacunación en sus propios países.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Avaliar as estruturas da legislação relativas à vacinação em crianças no Caribe de língua inglesa e holandesa e propor um modelo de legislação para os países caribenhos. Métodos. Este estudo incluiu uma pesquisa relativa à exigência legal em 22 países e territórios do Caribe de vacinação para admissão em escolas, alocações orçamentárias, sanções ou isenções. Um consultor jurídico realizou ampla pesquisa e análise da legislação relativa à vacinação em 13 países/territórios do Caribe. Uma análise comparativa da legislação referente a cinco temas – estrutura legislativa, vacinação obrigatória, cronograma nacional de imunização, sanções e isenções – formou a base para o modelo de legislação proposto. Resultados. Entre os 22 países/territórios caribenhos, 17 (77%) tinham legislação que exigia a vacinação; em 16 (94%), a vacinação era obrigatória para admissão na escola; 8 (47%) tinham orçamento exclusivo para programas de imunização; e em 13 (76%), a legislação não contemplava cronogramas nacionais. Com relação à fonte da legislação, seis (35%) países usavam a legislação de educação; oito, (47%) a Legislação de Saúde Pública; e cinco (29%), legislação de vacinação independente. Três países/territórios - Jamaica, Montserrat e Santa Lúcia - tinham regulamentações para imunização. Dos 17 países com legislação, 12 (71%) incluíam sanções e 10 (59%) permitiam isenções por crenças médicas ou religiosas/filosóficas. Conclusões. Diversos países do Caribe estabelecem que não vacinar uma criança é violação da lei. Ao resumir as estruturas de legislação existentes e as abordagens da imunização no Caribe, a análise orienta os formuladores de políticas a realizar mudanças efetivas na legislação de imunização em seus próprios países.

A review of immunization legislation for children in English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean countries / Revisión de los marcos legislativos sobre vacunación infantil en países de habla inglesa y neerlandesa del Caribe / Revisão da legislação relativa à imunização em crianças nos países do Caribe de língua inglesa e holandesa

ABSTRACT Objective. To assess the legislative frameworks concerning childhood vaccination in the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean and propose a model legislative framework for Caribbean countries. Methods. This study included a survey of 22 countries and territories in the Caribbean regarding legal vaccination mandates for school entry, budget allocations, sanctions, or exemptions. A legal consultant conducted a comprehensive search and analysis of legislation regarding vaccination among 13 Caribbean countries/territories. A comparative analysis of the legislation under five themes—legislative structure, mandatory vaccination, national immunization schedule, sanctions, and exemptions—formed the basis for the proposed model legislation. Results. Among the 22 Caribbean countries/territories, 17 (77%) had legislation mandating vaccination, 16 (94%) mandated vaccination for school entry, 8 (47%) had a dedicated budget for immunization programs, and 13 (76%) had no legislated national schedules. The source of legislation includes six (35%) using the Education Act, eight (47%) the Public Health Act, and five (29%) a free-standing Vaccination Act. Three countries/territories—Jamaica, Montserrat, and Saint Lucia—had immunization regulations. In 12 (71%) of the 17 countries with legislation, sanctions were included, and 10 (59%) permitted exemptions for medical or religious/philosophical beliefs. Conclusions. Several countries in the Caribbean have made failure to vaccinate a child an offense. By summarizing the existing legislative frameworks and approaches to immunization in the Caribbean, the analysis guides policymakers in making effective changes to immunization legislation in their own countries.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Evaluar los marcos legislativos relativos a la vacunación infantil en el Caribe de habla inglesa y neerlandesa y proponer un modelo de marco legislativo para los países del Caribe. Métodos. En este estudio se incluyó una encuesta en 22 países y territorios del Caribe sobre los requisitos legales de vacunación para el ingreso escolar, asignaciones presupuestarias, sanciones o exenciones. Un consultor jurídico realizó una búsqueda y un análisis exhaustivos de la legislación relativa a la vacunación en 13 países y territorios del Caribe. Un análisis comparativo de la legislación dividido en cinco temas (estructura legislativa, vacunación obligatoria, calendario nacional de vacunación, sanciones y exenciones) formó la base del modelo de legislación propuesto. Resultados. Entre los 22 países y territorios del Caribe, 17 (77%) contaban con leyes sobre vacunación obligatoria, 16 (94%) exigían la vacunación para el ingreso escolar, 8 (47%) tenían un presupuesto dedicado a los programas de vacunación y 13 (76%) no disponían de calendarios nacionales estipulados por ley. Entre las fuentes de la legislación, seis países y territorios (35%) empleaban la ley de educación, ocho (47%) la ley de salud pública y cinco (29%) una ley independiente de vacunación. Tres países y territorios —Jamaica, Montserrat y Santa Lucía— disponían de regulaciones sobre vacunación. Doce (71%) de los 17 países con legislación tenían sanciones y 10 (59%) permitían exenciones por creencias médicas o religiosas o filosóficas. Conclusiones. Varios países del Caribe han tipificado como delito el no vacunar a un niño o niña. Al resumir los enfoques y marcos legislativos existentes para la vacunación en el Caribe, este análisis ofrece orientaciones a los responsables de formular las políticas para que realicen modificaciones efectivas en la legislación relativa a la vacunación en sus propios países.

RESUMO Objetivo. Avaliar as estruturas da legislação relativas à vacinação em crianças no Caribe de língua inglesa e holandesa e propor um modelo de legislação para os países caribenhos. Métodos. Este estudo incluiu uma pesquisa relativa à exigência legal em 22 países e territórios do Caribe de vacinação para admissão em escolas, alocações orçamentárias, sanções ou isenções. Um consultor jurídico realizou ampla pesquisa e análise da legislação relativa à vacinação em 13 países/territórios do Caribe. Uma análise comparativa da legislação referente a cinco temas - estrutura legislativa, vacinação obrigatória, cronograma nacional de imunização, sanções e isenções - formou a base para o modelo de legislação proposto. Resultados. Entre os 22 países/territórios caribenhos, 17 (77%) tinham legislação que exigia a vacinação; em 16 (94%), a vacinação era obrigatória para admissão na escola; 8 (47%) tinham orçamento exclusivo para programas de imunização; e em 13 (76%), a legislação não contemplava cronogramas nacionais. Com relação à fonte da legislação, seis (35%) países usavam a legislação de educação; oito, (47%) a Legislação de Saúde Pública; e cinco (29%), legislação de vacinação independente. Três países/territórios - Jamaica, Montserrat e Santa Lúcia - tinham regulamentações para imunização. Dos 17 países com legislação, 12 (71%) incluíam sanções e 10 (59%) permitiam isenções por crenças médicas ou religiosas/filosóficas. Conclusões. Diversos países do Caribe estabelecem que não vacinar uma criança é violação da lei. Ao resumir as estruturas de legislação existentes e as abordagens da imunização no Caribe, a análise orienta os formuladores de políticas a realizar mudanças efetivas na legislação de imunização em seus próprios países.

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after the Omicron surge, Kingston, Jamaica, 2022.

A cross-sectional SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey was conducted after the Omicron surge in Jamaica using 1,540 samples collected during March - May 2022 from persons attending antenatal, STI and non-communicable diseases clinics in Kingston, Jamaica. SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain (RBD) and/or nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were detected for 88.4% of the study population, with 77.0% showing evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and/or with COVID-19 vaccination, 9.6% were negative for spike RBD IgG, most of which were unvaccinated previously infected persons. Amongst unvaccinated previously infected people, age was associated with testing spike RBD IgG negative. When considering all samples, median spike RBD IgG levels were 131.6 BAU/mL for unvaccinated persons with serological evidence of past infection, 90.3 BAU/mL for vaccinated persons without serological evidence of past infection, and 896.1 BAU/mL for vaccinated persons with serological evidence of past infection. Our study of the first reported SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey in Jamaica shows extensive SARS-CoV-2 population immunity, identifies a substantial portion of the population lacking spike RBD IgG, and provides additional evidence for increasing COVID-19 vaccine coverage in Jamaica.

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies after the Omicron Surge, Kingston, Jamaica, 2022.

A cross-sectional SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey was conducted after the Omicron surge in Jamaica using 1,540 samples collected during March â€" May 2022 from persons attending antenatal, STI and non-communicable diseases clinics in Kingston, Jamaica. SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain (RBD) and/or nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were detected for 88.4% of the study population, with 77.0% showing evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and/or with COVID-19 vaccination, 9.6% were negative for spike RBD IgG, most of which were unvaccinated previously infected persons. Amongst unvaccinated previously infected people, age was associated with testing spike RBD IgG negative. When considering all samples, median spike RBD IgG levels were 131.6 BAU/mL for unvaccinated persons with serological evidence of past infection, 90.3 BAU/mL for vaccinated persons without serological evidence of past infection, and 896.1 BAU/mL for vaccinated persons with serological evidence of past infection. Our study of the first reported SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey in Jamaica shows extensive SARS-CoV-2 population immunity, identifies a substantial portion of the population lacking spike RBD IgG, and provides additional evidence for increasing COVID-19 vaccine coverage in Jamaica.

Achieving global equity for COVID-19 vaccines: Stronger international partnerships and greater advocacy and solidarity are needed.

Peter Figueroa and co-authors advocate for equity in the worldwide provision of COVID-19 vaccines.

Global public health security and justice for vaccines and therapeutics in the COVID-19 pandemic.

A Lancet Commission for COVID-19 task force is shaping recommendations to achieve vaccine and therapeutics access, justice, and equity. This includes ensuring safety and effectiveness harmonized through robust systems of global pharmacovigilance and surveillance. Global production requires expanding support for development, manufacture, testing, and distribution of vaccines and therapeutics to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Global intellectual property rules must not stand in the way of research, production, technology transfer, or equitable access to essential health tools, and in context of pandemics to achieve increased manufacturing without discouraging innovation. Global governance around product quality requires channelling widely distributed vaccines through WHO prequalification (PQ)/emergency use listing (EUL) mechanisms and greater use of national regulatory authorities. A World Health Assembly (WHA) resolution would facilitate improvements and consistency in quality control and assurances. Global health systems require implementing steps to strengthen national systems for controlling COVID-19 and for influenza vaccinations for adults including pregnant and lactating women. A collaborative research network should strive to establish open access databases for bioinformatic analyses, together with programs directed at human capacity utilization and strengthening. Combating anti-science recognizes the urgency for countermeasures to address a global-wide disinformation movement dominating the internet and infiltrating parliaments and local governments.

HIV program outcomes for Jamaica before and after "Treat All": A population-based study using the national treatment services database.

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess changes in HIV treatment outcomes for Jamaica after the implementation of the WHO Treat All strategy in January 2017, as well as identify variables associated with clinical stage at diagnosis and viral load status, in order to understand implications for enhancing the HIV clinical cascade and boosting progress towards the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. METHOD: This is a population-based study using the National Treatment Service Information System. The sample consists of persons 15 years and older, placed on treatment before and after Treat All was implemented, across all 4 regional health authorities in Jamaica. Patients were assessed for two binary outcomes: 1. stage at HIV diagnosis (early/baseline CD4 cell count ≧350 cells/mm3, or late/ baseline CD4 <350 cells/mm3), 2. viral load status achieved after ART initiation (suppressed/<1000 copies/ml or non-suppressed/ ≥1000 copies/ml). Categorical variables: age/years, gender and health regions, were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are reported. RESULTS: After Treat All, there was an increase in median baseline CD4 results as the proportion of late diagnoses decreased from 60% to 39%. There was a small increase in viral suppression from 76% to 80%, a decrease in baseline viral load testing from 61% to 46% and an increase in the uptake of first viral load testing after starting treatment from 13% to 19%. Males and persons 40+ years had higher odds of late diagnosis before and after Treat All. CONCLUSION: Jamaica's HIV program outcomes have improved after Treat All was implemented. ART initiation time significantly decreased. Early diagnosis, viral load testing uptake and viral suppression increased. However, there is a need to implement targeted testing for men and persons over 40 years to decrease the frequency of late diagnosis.